Current:Home > MarketsThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -AssetBase
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-13 11:49:03
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- U.S. rape suspect Nicholas Alahverdian, who allegedly faked his death, set to be extradited from U.K.
- A Hong Kong man gets 4 months in prison for importing children’s books deemed to be seditious
- New Mexico AG charges police officer in fatal shooting of Black man at gas station
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Appeals panel won’t revive lawsuit against Tennessee ban on giving out mail voting form
- After a career of cracking cold cases, investigator Paul Holes opens up
- Colorado funeral home with ‘green’ burials under investigation after improperly stored bodies found
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Prosecutor won’t seek charges against troopers in killing of ‘Cop City’ activist near Atlanta
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Eligible electric and plug-in vehicle buyers will get US tax credits immediately in 2024
- The job market was stunningly strong in September
- U.S. rape suspect Nicholas Alahverdian, who allegedly faked his death, set to be extradited from U.K.
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Flying is awful, complaints show. Here's how to make it less so for holiday travel.
- 'A person of greatness': Mourners give Dianne Feinstein fond farewell in San Francisco
- Georgia Power will pay $413 million to settle lawsuit over nuclear reactor cost overruns
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Not Girl Scout cookies! Inflation has come for one of America's favorite treats
'Cat Person' and the problem with having sex with someone just to 'get it over with'
Buy now pay later apps will get heavy use this holiday season. Why it's worrisome.
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
What is Indigenous Peoples Day? A day of celebration, protest and reclaiming history
‘It was just despair’: Abortion bans leave doctors uncertain about care - even in emergencies
Guatemala’s highest court says prosecutors can suspend president-elect’s party