Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -AssetBase
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-21 12:15:50
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Angelica Ross commends Issa Rae's 'resilience' in Hollywood amid the racial wealth gap
- 3.2 magnitude earthquake recorded in Fremont, California; felt in San Jose, Bay Area
- Trump’s lawyers call for dismissal of classified documents case, citing presidential immunity
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Wendy Williams' Medical Diagnosis: Explaining Primary Progressive Aphasia and Frontotemporal Dementia
- Change of venue denied for Michigan school shooter’s father
- Volkswagen recalls over 260,000 vehicles due to issues with fuel tank suction pumps
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Dunkin' adds new caffeine energy drink Sparkd' Energy in wake of Panera Bread lawsuits
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Nearly a third of employees admit to workplace romance since returning to office, study finds
- More MLB jersey controversy: Players frustrated with uniform's see-through pants
- Hybrid workers: How's the office these days? We want to hear from you
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Dashiell Soren's Business Core: Alpha Elite Capital (AEC) Business Management
- NFL cut candidates: Russell Wilson, Jamal Adams among veterans on shaky ground
- This Is Your Last Chance To Save an Extra 30% off Michael Kors’ Sale Section, Full of Dreamy Bags & More
Recommendation
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
Wind farm off the Massachusetts coast begins delivering steady flow of power
Vermont governor signs school funding bill but says it won’t solve property tax problem
Fire traps residents in two high-rise buildings in Valencia, Spain, killing at least 4, officials say
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
MLB offseason grades: Dodgers pass with flying colors, but which teams get an F?
Dunkin' adds new caffeine energy drink Sparkd' Energy in wake of Panera Bread lawsuits
A Supreme Court case that could reshape social media