Current:Home > NewsCalifornia utility will pay $80M to settle claims its equipment sparked devastating 2017 wildfire -AssetBase
California utility will pay $80M to settle claims its equipment sparked devastating 2017 wildfire
View
Date:2025-04-26 18:15:33
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Southern California Edison will pay $80 million to settle claims on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017, federal prosecutors said Monday.
The utility agreed to the settlement on Friday without admitting wrongdoing or fault in connection with the Thomas fire, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said in a statement.
Investigations found utility equipment sparked the fire in two canyon locations on Dec. 4, 2017. The Thomas fire, which burned across 439 square miles (1,137 square kilometers) in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, is the seventh largest blaze in California history, according to state fire officials.
Edison said it would have a statement on the settlement later Monday.
Federal prosecutors sued the utility in 2020 to recover costs incurred fighting the fire and for the extensive damage caused on public lands within the Los Padres National Forest. The lawsuit alleged Edison power lines and a transformer ignited dry brush during powerful winds.
The agreement “provides significant compensation to taxpayers,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph T. McNally said in a statement.
It’s the latest settlement by Edison over the Thomas fire. The utility has also settled claims related to the enormous Woolsey fire in 2018. Edison estimated in 2021 that total expected losses for both blazes would exceed $4.5 billion.
California has seen increasingly destructive wildfires in recent years, made worse by climate change and drought. Utility equipment has been blamed for sparking some the state’s worst fires.
In 2022, former executives and directors of Pacific Gas & Electric agreed to pay $117 million to settle a lawsuit over devastating Northern California wildfires sparked by that utility’s equipment in 2017 and 2018.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Elizabeth Holmes, once worth $4.5 billion, says she can't afford to pay victims $250 a month
- Woman, 28, arrested for posing as 17-year-old student at Louisiana high school
- As Solar Panel Prices Plunge, U.S. Developers Look to Diversify
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- With Oil Sands Ambitions on a Collision Course With Climate Change, Exxon Still Stepping on the Gas
- 2016: Canada’s Oil Sands Downturn Hints at Ominous Future
- Many Americans don't know basic abortion facts. Test your knowledge
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- U.S. Taxpayers on the Hook for Insuring Farmers Against Growing Climate Risks
Ranking
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Nicole Richie Shares Rare Glimpse of 15-Year-Old Daughter Harlow in Family Photo
- QUIZ: How much do you know about what causes a pandemic?
- Today's Hoda Kotb Says Daughter Hope Has a Longer Road Ahead After Health Scare
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Justin Long and Kate Bosworth Are Married One Month After Announcing Engagement
- Four killer whales spotted together in rare sighting in southern New England waters
- Oklahoma Tries Stronger Measures to Stop Earthquakes in Fracking Areas
Recommendation
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
What Ariana Madix's Vanderpump Rules Co-Stars Really Think of Her New Man Daniel Wai
It’s ‘Going to End with Me’: The Fate of Gulf Fisheries in a Warming World
Clean Energy Investment ‘Bank’ Has Bipartisan Support, But No Money
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
Joe Biden on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
Joe Biden on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
Developer Pulls Plug on Wisconsin Wind Farm Over Policy Uncertainty